AI consulting services, including what not to build
Our AI consulting services put a senior engineer inside your problem for two to four weeks, looking at your real data. You get a sequenced, costed roadmap — and an honest list of the ideas that aren't worth it yet.
Roadmap
- Phase 1months 0–3
- Customer email triage
- Supplier invoice data extraction
- Phase 2months 3–6
- Demand forecasting
- Phase 3months 6–12
- Internal assistant over procedures
- Don't build
- Website chatbot with no knowledge base
- Agent that approves payments on its own
Candidate use cases
Customer email triageDo now
Do now · Impact 5/5 · Effort 2/5
- Why
- High, repetitive volume, the emails already sit in a shared inbox and the result is measurable straight away. The fast first win.
- Metric:
- Time to first response
- On the roadmap:
- Phase 1 · months 0–3
Supplier invoice data extractionDo now
Do now · Impact 4/5 · Effort 2/5
- Why
- A manual process with clear rules and an ERP the result has to land in. Exceptions stay with a person.
- Metric:
- Invoices posted without manual correction
- On the roadmap:
- Phase 1 · months 0–3
Demand forecastingNext
Next · Impact 5/5 · Effort 4/5
- Why
- High value, but the sales history has gaps. Data readiness gets fixed first; the model comes after.
- Metric:
- Stock-outs and overstock
- On the roadmap:
- Phase 2 · months 3–6
Internal assistant over proceduresNext
Next · Impact 4/5 · Effort 5/5
- Why
- Useful for the team, but it depends on up-to-date documentation and someone who owns it. It comes in once phase 1 has proven the return.
- Metric:
- Questions resolved without escalation
- On the roadmap:
- Phase 3 · months 6–12
Website chatbot with no knowledge baseDon't build
Don't build · Impact 1/5 · Effort 2/5
- Why
- No knowledge base and no owner: it answers badly and nobody fixes it. It stays on the do-not-build list until both exist.
- On the roadmap:
- Don't build
Agent that approves payments on its ownDon't build
Don't build · Impact 2/5 · Effort 5/5
- Why
- A financial action with no human review: the risk outweighs the gain. Invoice extraction already covers the safe part of the work.
- On the roadmap:
- Don't build
Fictitious use cases and scores, only to show the method: impact and effort from 1 to 5, the call, and where each one lands on the roadmap.
Selected work
Case study· Luxembourg
Right-On-Skill · Nearshore tech team for an AI training companyTech Lead + Frontend Developer extending the engineering team for an AI training platform.
- Problem
- Scale the team without diluting architectural ownership.
- Approach
- We diagnose before we propose. Skilled talent placed in two weeks, fully aligned.
- Outcome
- Architectural foundation ready to scale. AI layer plugs in cleanly.
- 2 wksFrom briefing to first developer integrated
- 0Rejected CVs — right-fit on first match
- –70%Reduced reliance on external suppliers
Case study· European Union
Hospital Management SaaS · Real-time facilities & patient recordsReal-time facilities reservation and patient records SaaS for hospital operators.
- Problem
- Hospital facilities management is a real-time problem with patient-safety implications.
- Approach
- Patient context, real-time facilities, conflict detection, accessibility — in one workflow.
- Outcome
- From manual coordination to real-time intelligence at the bedside.
- Real-timeLive occupancy view across all wards and rooms
- WCAGFull accessibility compliance with adaptive font controls
- MultiHospital SaaS architecture with isolated deployments
Unlocking Tech is an AI consultancy and engineering company based in Lisbon, Portugal, running AI strategy consulting for SMEs and scale-ups — typically companies of 10 to 200 people in real estate, clinics, retail, construction, logistics and B2B services. The engagement runs two to four weeks at a fixed price agreed in a 30-minute scoping call before anything starts, and it is run by senior engineers who ship AI to production, not by analysts. You leave with a scored opportunity map, an editable ROI model, a data-readiness report, an EU AI Act and GDPR risk note, and a costed 6-to-12-month roadmap that includes an explicit list of what not to build. The plan is yours and any competent team can execute it; building it with us is a separate decision.
- Typical engagement length
- 2–4weeks
- Price, scoped on the first call
- Fixed
- Sequenced, costed roadmap horizon
- 6–12months
- Not analysts. The same engineers who'd build it.
- Senior
- Scoping call to know if you even need this
- 30min
A plan you can defend.And a build spec.
No frameworks from an analyst. No deck you can't act on. A costed roadmap grounded in your real data, detailed enough to hand straight to a build team.
Decide what to do
A scored opportunity map
Every candidate use case on one impact-versus-effort grid, each tied to a real process, an owner, and a measurable metric — not a brainstorm list.
A build-vs-buy call per use case
Build custom, wrap an existing model or API, buy off-the-shelf, or do nothing — with the specific tools and vendors we'd actually choose, and why.
Weigh cost and risk
A costed ROI model you can edit
Build cost in engineering weeks, recurring inference and infra cost at real volume, and the value side with every assumption stated and a break-even line. A spreadsheet, not a slogan.
An EU AI Act and GDPR risk note
Each use case classified by risk, with lawful basis, data residency, and DPIA triggers flagged — and a clear note on what needs your lawyer. Practical, not a legal opinion.
Prepare and sequence
A data-readiness report
What data exists, where it lives, and the quality, coverage, and labelling gaps to fix before any model earns its keep. Usually the real bottleneck, surfaced early.
A sequenced 6–12 month roadmap
Phased, costed, dependency-ordered, and detailed enough to be the build spec — designed so the first shippable result lands fast. Plus an explicit do-not-build list.
Five steps,first win lands fast.
From scoping call to live readout — most candidate ideas get cut along the way, and that's the point.
- 01SCOPEScoping call
Thirty minutes, an engineer on our side. We cover the business pressure, the data situation, and the budget. Sometimes you already know what to build and should skip straight to development — we'll say so.
- 02DISCOVERDiscovery
Week one to two: we interview the people who own the processes and the people who own the data, get read access to the relevant systems, and look at the actual schemas, volumes, and quality — not a description of them.
- 03SCOREAnalysis and scoring
Week two to three: each candidate gets a feasibility verdict, a cost model, a compliance classification, and a build-buy-or-do-nothing call. This is where most candidates get cut.
- 04SEQUENCERoadmap synthesis
Week three to four: we sequence the survivors into phases with dependencies and a fast first win, attach a metric and a cost ceiling to each, and write the do-not-build list.
- 05HAND OVERReadout and handover
A working session walking you through the plan, the numbers, and the trade-offs — argued live, not just emailed. You own every artifact. If a build follows, the roadmap is the spec.
We'll tell younot to build it.
If any of these sound familiar, we should talk.
Founders with a board mandate
On the hook to "have an AI strategy"
You're dealing with
- A deadline to have a plan and no shortlist
- Pressure to defend it to investors
- Real risk of spending six figures on the wrong idea
What you're after
You need a credible, costed plan you can defend — and a filter that kills the bad ideas first.
Outcome
A plan you can put in front of the board, with the bad bets already cut.
CTOs with more ideas than budget
Whose team is pitching agents, copilots and RAG
You're dealing with
- More proposals than budget to fund them
- No outside read on what's feasible against your data
- Compliance landmines hiding in the backlog
What you're after
You need a senior outside read on which ideas are feasible, which are risks, and what order to do them in.
Outcome
A sequenced shortlist you trust, with the landmines flagged.
Leaders whose pilot stalled
A POC that demoed well and died in production
You're dealing with
- Data that wasn't ready for production
- Costs that blew up at real volume
- No one ever defined what success meant
What you're after
You need an honest read on why it failed, a data-readiness fix, and a path that accounts for production reality.
Outcome
A grounded second attempt that survives real users this time.



Senior engineers. No handovers. No fluff.
07.1AI consulting firm in Lisbon
An AI consulting firm that ships
Unlocking Tech is an AI consulting firm and engineering company based in Lisbon, Portugal.
Read moreShow less
Most AI consulting companies sell the plan and leave the build to someone else; our AI consultants are the senior engineers who would write the production code, so nothing goes on the roadmap that we couldn't ship ourselves. That changes the advice: fewer ideas survive, each one carries a cost and a metric, and AI implementation is a separate, optional decision — with us, your own team or another firm. Generative AI, LLMs and agentic AI get judged like any other tool: on your data, against a number.
AI consultancy in Lisbon, Portugal, for UK and EU teams
The team is in Lisbon, on the same clock as the UK — Portugal runs on WET/WEST, like GMT/BST — and an hour behind most of the EU.
Read moreShow less
We run the work in English or Portuguese, under EU contracts and the GDPR, on-site in Lisbon or remotely; Portuguese clients often mix an in-person kick-off with remote work. If you're comparing AI consultants in Lisbon or elsewhere in Portugal, the test is the same as anywhere: talk to the engineer who will do the work, and ask what they have shipped. Ours have shipped for clients in the UK, Luxembourg, the US and Portugal.
07.2AI readiness assessment
What is an AI readiness assessment?
An AI readiness assessment tells you whether your company can get value from AI now, where, and what has to be fixed first.
Read moreShow less
It's what the Book assessment button on this site starts: a free 30-minute call with a principal engineer, after which you have a first read — the use cases worth a closer look, the main risks, and whether you need the full assessment at all. If you do, the full AI readiness assessment is the two-to-four-week engagement on this page, at a fixed price agreed on that call, ending in a scored opportunity map, a data-readiness report and a costed roadmap.
AI readiness assessment: the six things we check
We score six areas, each against your real systems rather than a questionnaire.
- 01Strategy and use caseswhich processes, owners and metrics AI could move.
- 02Datawhat exists, where it lives, and its quality, coverage and labelling.
- 03Systems and integrationthe APIs, ERP and CRM an AI output has to land in.
- 04People and processwho owns each use case, the skills in the team, and the change management a rollout needs.
- 05Governance and riskthe GDPR, data governance and the EU AI Act class of each use case.
- 06Cost and ROIbuild cost, inference cost at real volume, and a break-even line.
07.3From strategy to implementation
From AI strategy to implementation
The roadmap is written to be the build spec: each use case has a metric, a cost ceiling, its dependencies and a first milestone.
Read moreShow less
Implementation — where AI adoption actually happens — usually starts with the use case that gives the fastest measurable win, so the first result makes the case for the next. If you build with us, the same engineers move from assessment to custom AI development, integration or automation without a handover; if you build with your own team or another AI implementation partner, they get the same documents. Either way the do-not-build list stays on the table, so the roadmap doesn't quietly grow back.
Use cases we find (and the ones we kill)
The use cases that survive scoring tend to look like work we have already shipped: file and document processing, lead qualification and routing, reconciliation and reporting, and assistants that answer from a company's own documents.
Read moreShow less
The ones we kill are just as consistent: a chatbot with no knowledge base and no owner; a model for data that doesn't exist yet; an agent allowed to take fiscal or legal actions with no human review; and anything a rule, an integration or an off-the-shelf tool already solves for less. Generative AI makes the first list longer. It doesn't shorten the second.
Tend to survive scoring
- File and document processing
- Lead qualification and routing
- Reconciliation and reporting
- Assistants that answer from a company's own documents
The ones we kill
- A chatbot with no knowledge base and no owner
- A model for data that doesn't exist yet
- An agent taking fiscal or legal actions with no human review
- Anything a rule, an integration or an off-the-shelf tool solves for less
07.4Governance and cost
Governance and the EU AI Act
AI governance, for a company of 10 to 200 people, is mostly four decisions written down: who owns each AI system, what data it may use, what it may do without a person, and how its quality is measured.
Read moreShow less
We set those per use case, alongside the compliance work: the EU AI Act risk class (most business uses are minimal or limited risk, with transparency and AI-literacy duties; hiring, credit scoring of individuals and medical devices are high-risk), the GDPR lawful basis, data residency and DPIA triggers. That is responsible AI in practice: rules a team can follow. We flag what needs your lawyer; we don't issue legal opinions.
Four decisions written down, per use case
- Who owns the system
- What data it may use
- What it may do without a person
- How its quality is measured
- EU AI Act risk: Minimal or limitedExamplesMost business usesWhat it bringsTransparency and AI-literacy duties
- EU AI Act risk: HighExamplesHiring, credit scoring of individuals, safety components of medical devicesWhat it bringsConformity obligations
What does AI consulting cost?
With us, the first 30-minute assessment call is free.
Read moreShow less
The AI readiness assessment and roadmap has a fixed price, agreed on that call from the size of the problem, and runs two to four weeks. What moves the price: how many processes and use cases are in scope, how many systems and data sources we need to inspect, how many people we interview, and whether a use case needs a deeper EU AI Act or GDPR classification. Building is priced separately — most of our custom AI builds start between €15k and €50k. What you shouldn't pay for is a deck without a costed roadmap.
2–4 weeksfixed price, agreed on a free 30-minute call
- ScopeHow many processes and use cases are in scope.
- Systems and dataHow many systems and data sources we inspect.
- InterviewsHow many people we interview.
- ClassificationWhether a use case needs a deeper EU AI Act or GDPR look.
07.5AI strategy consulting
What an AI strategy consultant actually does
An AI strategy consultant looks at your business, your data, and your real constraints, then tells you where AI is worth the spend and where it isn't.
Read moreShow less
For an AI consultant, business outcomes come before the tech: the output is a decision, not a demo. Most don't write code; they write the plan you build against. Ours is run by a senior engineer who has shipped AI in production, so the advice is grounded in what actually works. We assess your data and systems, then return a costed, sequenced roadmap: the use cases ranked by payback, what each one needs to be feasible, and the order to build them in. We also tell you what NOT to build — the ideas that look good in a deck but won't earn their keep. You leave with a plan you could hand to any competent team. Building it is a separate decision.
AI consulting for small businesses
AI consulting for small businesses has to be different from the enterprise version: practical, costed, and honest about what isn't worth it yet.
Read moreShow less
We work with SMEs that want a clear answer before they spend. We look at how the business actually runs, where time and money leak, and which problems AI can move now versus which are better solved by a simpler fix. The roadmap is priced in real numbers and sequenced so the first thing you build pays for the next. Where the better move is strategic software development rather than an off-the-shelf tool, we say so and explain the trade-off — but the deliverable here is the plan and the reasoning behind it, not the software. Building anything is a separate, optional step.
Frequently asked questions
AI consulting services are senior advisory work that decides what AI is worth building, in what order, and at what cost — before you spend on a build. Ours run two to four weeks at a fixed price, scoped on a 30-minute call, and the headline artifacts include a scored opportunity map, an editable ROI model, a data-readiness report, an EU AI Act and GDPR risk note, and a sequenced 6–12 month roadmap with an explicit do-not-build list. The engineers assessing your data are the same ones who would build it, so you get a technical, costed plan rather than a framework from an analyst.
Fixed price, scoped on the first call from the size of the problem — you know the number before we start. Typically two to four weeks. You get an editable cost model, a data-readiness report, a compliance classification, and a roadmap detailed enough to be a build spec. If you only want slides, there are cheaper ways to get them.
The plan is yours regardless of who builds it, written so your team or another firm can execute it. Real strategy work ends with do-not-build lines and sometimes "you don't need us for this part." If everything pointed to off-the-shelf software, the roadmap would say buy — and we'd have earned a smaller fee.
We won't write production code, train models, or ship anything — that's AI Development, a separate engagement. We won't give a legal opinion; we classify risk and flag what needs your counsel. And we won't produce ROI numbers without showing the assumptions, or invent a use case to justify a roadmap.
The other four do the work — Development builds, Integration wires it in, Automation ships workflows, Support & Scale operates it. Strategy decides what's worth doing and in what order, and it's the only one that can recommend doing nothing. The people assessing your data are the same engineers who'd build it, so the output is a technical costed plan, not a framework from an analyst.
An AI strategy consultant assesses your business, data, and systems and decides where AI is worth the investment — and where it isn't. The deliverable is a plan, not code: a costed, sequenced roadmap that ranks use cases by payback, states what each one needs to be feasible, and sets the order to build them in. A good AI consultant is also clear about what NOT to build. Ours is a senior engineer who has shipped AI in production, so the recommendations are grounded in delivery, not theory.
Yes. We do AI consulting for small businesses and SMEs — practical, costed, and honest about what isn't worth it. We look at how the business runs, where the costs are, and which problems AI can realistically move, then return a roadmap priced in real numbers and sequenced so the first step funds the next. If the better answer is strategic software development rather than a tool you can buy, we'll say so and explain the trade-off. This engagement produces a plan and clear reasoning; building anything is a separate, optional step.
Four questions settle it. Is the person looking at your data an engineer who has shipped AI to production, or an analyst? Is the price fixed and agreed before the work starts, or open-ended by the hour? Is what you leave with a plan any competent team can execute, or a deck that only makes sense if they build it? And will they tell you not to build something? An AI consultancy that approves every idea is selling the next build. Ask to meet the engineer who will do the work, not the person selling it.
Yes. Portugal runs on the same clock as the UK (WET/WEST, like GMT/BST) and an hour behind most of the EU, we work in English or Portuguese, and the engagement runs remotely, with on-site sessions in Lisbon when they help. Personal data is handled under the GDPR. Our engineers have shipped for clients in the UK, Luxembourg, the US and Portugal.
Start your deployment.
Talk directly to a principal engineer.
No sales team.
No discovery workshops.
No procurement circus.
We scope, build and ship.
- Reply within one business day
- Engineer-led assessment
- Written proposal
- Lisbon · UK time zone
No commitment. Just an engineer.

